Reply To: The FX-8 is being replaced by the FX-9
From a tech’s point of view it seems like there has been a great deal of replacing of fillers. They seem to come faster these days. Was there something wrong with the previous fillers? I am not trying to complain, but I am trying to understand the progression of the fillers. Are the strengths the same and they just have required less and less heat to cure the product or is it other enhanced features like grainability or durability that have driven the multiple replicants. Maybe a simple listing of these fillers, there progression, and there traits would help the techs in the field understand this a little better. I know it would help me. Maybe it is just a case of too much new technology too fast for this older tech.
One Old Dog